AI Search Intelligence Report

Cookies

How 11 Brands Are Winning - and Losing - the Battle for Consumer Attention across ChatGPT, Gemini & Claude
February 23, 2026 | Powered by GeoVector.ai

Executive Summary

Tate's Bake Shop Dominates ChatGPT While Oreo Rules Gemini - AI Visibility Defies Real-World Market Share

Across 80 prompts, 11 brands, and 7 companies analyzed on ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude, the cookies category reveals a striking divergence between real-world shelf dominance and AI visibility. Brand Share weighs where in the AI response a brand appears and how much detail is given - not just whether it's mentioned. A brand featured prominently at the top with rich detail scores exponentially higher than one briefly listed at the end. By this measure, Tate's Bake Shop - a premium, specialty brand - commands 63.9% Brand Share on ChatGPT, dwarfing the category's real-world giant Oreo (8.8% on the same platform). Meanwhile, Oreo dominates Gemini at 46.2%. This platform split is the defining story: no single brand owns AI search across all three assistants. Critically, 100% of the 290 citations analyzed are third-party - meaning every brand's AI visibility is built entirely on earned media, not owned content.

The AI Cookies Market at a Glance

11
Brands Tracked
80
Consumer Prompts
129
Total AI Mentions
100%
3rd-Party Citations

Who Wins on Each Platform - and Why It Matters

Rank ChatGPTShareGeminiShareClaudeShare Parent Co.
1Tate's Bake Shop63.9%Oreo46.2%Tate's Bake Shop34.9%Mixed
2Oreo8.8%Tate's Bake Shop16.7%Oreo30.7%Mixed
3Pepperidge Farm7.8%Pepperidge Farm14.0%Pepperidge Farm23.2%Campbell Soup Company
4Nature Valley6.8%Famous Amos7.3%Great Value8.9%Mixed
5Little Debbie4.5%Nilla Wafers5.8%Nutter Butter2.3%Mixed

4 Patterns Shaping the AI Cookies Landscape

1

Premium Beats Mass in AI Recommendations

Tate's Bake Shop, a premium specialty brand, captures 63.9% Brand Share on ChatGPT - more than 7x Oreo's share on the same platform. AI assistants appear to reward quality positioning and specificity over mass-market scale, inverting traditional FMCG market dynamics.

2

Platform Divergence Creates Strategic Risk

Oreo leads Gemini at 46.2% but scores only 8.8% on ChatGPT. Tate's Bake Shop leads ChatGPT at 63.9% but drops to 16.7% on Gemini. No brand dominates all three platforms simultaneously - a single-platform AI strategy leaves significant share on the table.

3

20 Content Vacuums Represent Untapped Territory

20 consumer questions - including high-intent comparisons like 'How do premium cookies compare to store brands?' - receive zero brand mentions across all three AI platforms. These are not niche queries; they are mainstream buying questions that every AI answers but no cookie brand has claimed.

4

Zero Owned Citations - A Structural Vulnerability

Of 290 total citations analyzed, not a single one is brand-owned. Every brand's AI visibility is entirely dependent on third-party sources like cheryls.com, kingarthurbaking.com, and wikipedia.org. This means any brand's AI presence can erode if third-party coverage shifts.

The Real Competitive Map: Companies, Not Just Brands

Brand-level data reveals platform-specific winners, but company-level aggregation tells the more strategic story. Mondelez's three-brand portfolio generates an estimated combined share that rivals or exceeds any single competitor on Gemini - but that advantage collapses on ChatGPT. Understanding portfolio dynamics, not just individual brand performance, is the competitive edge.

Cross-Platform Brand Share: Who Leads Where?

Brand Share measures position-adjusted influence across AI responses - not just whether a brand is mentioned, but how prominently. The table below shows how the top brands' share varies across platforms, revealing platform-specific strategies and blind spots.

Brand Parent Co. ChatGPT ShareGemini ShareClaude Share What This Means
Tate's Bake Shop Tate's Bake Shop 63.9%16.7%34.9% ChatGPT dominant at 63.9% but loses ground sharply on Gemini
Oreo Mondelez 8.8%46.2%30.7% Gemini powerhouse at 46.2% but nearly invisible on ChatGPT
Pepperidge Farm Campbell Soup Company 7.8%14.0%23.2% Most consistent cross-platform presence - strongest on Claude at 23.2%
Nature Valley General Mills 6.8%0.0%0.0% ChatGPT-only brand - completely absent on Gemini and Claude
Nilla Wafers Mondelez 0.0%5.8%0.0% Gemini-exclusive visibility - zero share on ChatGPT and Claude
Great Value Walmart 3.5%1.6%8.9% Claude specialist at 8.9% - underperforms on other platforms
Famous Amos Ferrero 1.7%7.3%0.0% Gemini-focused at 7.3% with near-zero presence elsewhere

πŸ’‘ The Nature Valley Problem: Maximum Efficiency, Minimum Reach

Nature Valley ranks 10th by total mentions but 4th by Brand Share - a 6-rank gap that signals exceptional positioning efficiency on ChatGPT (6.8x efficiency score). When it appears, it dominates the response. But it appears on only one platform and in only one mention. For a CMO, this is a warning: high efficiency with near-zero reach is not a competitive position - it is a fragile foothold. The priority must be expanding the contexts in which Nature Valley earns mentions, particularly on Gemini and Claude where it is currently invisible.

The Portfolio Advantage: Coordinated vs. Fragmented

🏒

Mondelez: The Gemini Portfolio Powerhouse

Mondelez operates three brands in this category - Oreo, Nilla Wafers, and Nutter Butter - with an estimated combined Gemini share approaching 55%. Each brand serves a distinct consumer need: Oreo owns the sandwich cookie identity, Nilla Wafers captures dunking occasions, and Nutter Butter holds a niche flavor position. However, this portfolio advantage is platform-specific - on ChatGPT, combined share collapses to under 9%. Note: company-level shares are approximations as Brand Share is position-adjusted per response.

🏒

Ferrero: Gemini Dependent, Elsewhere Absent

Ferrero holds two brands - Famous Amos and Keebler - with an estimated combined Gemini share near 13%. Both brands are essentially invisible on Claude and marginal on ChatGPT. Rather than a coordinated portfolio strategy, these brands appear to be competing for the same Gemini audience without differentiated positioning. Note: company-level shares are approximations.

⚠️ The FMCG Portfolio Trap: AI Doesn't Work Like Shelf Space

In physical retail, more brands on shelf means more facings and more consumer choice moments. In AI search, the assistant recommends one answer - not a shelf. A portfolio of three brands does not guarantee three recommendations; it may generate one, or none. Mondelez's three-brand advantage on Gemini is real, but it requires each brand to own a distinct, defensible consumer question - not just exist in the category.

The AI Consumer Journey: Where Brands Win and Lose

The AI consumer journey moves through three stages: Discovery (what are cookies?), Research (which cookies are best for my need?), and Decision (where do I buy them?). The funnel reveals a tale of two brands - Oreo dominates Discovery but bleeds share by Decision, while Tate's Bake Shop does the opposite, gaining strength as consumers move closer to purchase.

How Tate's Bake Shop & Oreo Perform Across the Funnel

πŸ” Discovery

"What is...?" / "Tell me about..."
Tate's Bake Shop on ChatGPT50.0%
Oreo on ChatGPT50.0%
Tate's Bake Shop on Gemini-
Oreo on Gemini100.0%
Tate's Bake Shop on Claude-
Oreo on Claude100.0%

πŸ“Š Research

"Which is best for...?" / "Compare..."
Tate's Bake Shop on ChatGPT59.5%
Oreo on ChatGPT5.0%
Tate's Bake Shop on Gemini22.7%
Oreo on Gemini35.7%
Tate's Bake Shop on Claude36.6%
Oreo on Claude30.4%

βœ… Decision

"Where can I buy...?" / "Should I get...?"
Tate's Bake Shop on ChatGPT71.4%
Oreo on ChatGPT-
Tate's Bake Shop on Gemini16.4%
Oreo on Gemini40.2%
Tate's Bake Shop on Claude40.0%
Oreo on Claude17.1%

πŸ’‘ Tate's Bake Shop Converts Awareness Into Purchase Authority

Tate's Bake Shop demonstrates a rare growth funnel on ChatGPT: share rises from 50.0% at Discovery to 59.5% at Research to 71.4% at Decision - a +21.4pp gain. On Claude, it similarly grows from 36.6% to 40.0% through the funnel. Oreo tells the opposite story: it commands 100% Discovery share on both Gemini and Claude, but loses -59.8pp on Gemini and -82.9pp on Claude by Decision stage. At Decision, Pepperidge Farm captures 18.9% on Gemini and 32.9% on Claude, while Great Value takes 10.0% on Claude and Famous Amos claims 12.6% on Gemini - all benefiting from Oreo's funnel collapse.

Who Captures the Decision Stage? Specificity Wins.

Decision-Stage Prompt ChatGPT WinnerGemini WinnerClaude Winner Winning Pattern
Where can I buy gluten free cookies?Tate's Bake Shop (100%)Tate's Bake Shop (77%)Tate's Bake Shop (100%)Attribute
Where can I find cookies seasonal varieties?Pepperidge Farm (100%)Oreo (100%)Oreo (71%)Occasion
Where can I buy organic cookies?Nature Valley (100%)--Certification
Where can I find gourmet cookies?Tate's Bake Shop (100%)--Craft
Where can I find sandwich cookies?-Oreo (70%)-Use-case
Where can I find chocolate chip cookies?-Famous Amos (65%)-Attribute
Should I buy name brand or store cookies brands?-Oreo (52%)Oreo (50%)Brand Identity

πŸ’‘ The Decision-Stage Playbook: Own a Specific Consumer Need

Every Decision-stage winner in this category owns a specific, defensible consumer need. Tate's Bake Shop captures 100% share on gluten-free and gourmet queries on ChatGPT because it is the most specifically associated brand for those attributes. Pepperidge Farm owns seasonal varieties. Oreo owns sandwich cookies. The lesson for any CMO: broad category presence does not convert at Decision stage - specific attribute ownership does. Identify the two or three consumer needs your brand can own completely, and build content authority around those exact queries.

The 100% Monopoly Map: AI's Uncontested Territories

Across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude, 32 individual prompt-platform combinations result in a single brand capturing 100% Brand Share. These are not competitive battles - they are uncontested territories. Some are identity monopolies that are structurally hard to break; others are content vacuums that any well-positioned brand could claim with the right content strategy.

Who Owns the Gaps? Company-Level View

πŸ†

Tate's Bake Shop: 10+ Monopoly Wins Across Quality Themes

Tate's Bake Shop holds monopoly positions across gluten-free, gourmet, sugar-free, vegan, and highest-quality prompts - primarily on ChatGPT. These are identity monopolies built on consistent quality positioning. Competitors entering these spaces must overcome deeply embedded AI associations, not just create content.

πŸ₯ˆ

Mondelez: Oreo's Gemini Monopoly Cluster

Oreo holds multiple Gemini monopolies across discovery and research prompts - including sandwich cookies, sugar-free, seasonal varieties, and most popular varieties. Pepperidge Farm (Campbell Soup) also holds monopolies on seasonal and deals prompts, representing coordinated category coverage across companies.

The Monopoly Holders - Selected Prompts

Consumer Prompt ChatGPTGeminiClaude Opportunity
Where can I get gluten free cookies? Tate's Bake Shop βœ“Tate's Bake Shop βœ“Tate's Bake Shop βœ“
Which cookies have the most real ingredients? Tate's Bake Shop βœ“Keebler βœ“Tate's Bake Shop βœ“ Clean-label brands; ingredient-conscious consumers
How many calories are in average cookies? -Oreo βœ“Oreo βœ“
How much do cookies typically cost? Tate's Bake Shop βœ“Oreo βœ“-
What are the most common cookie flavors? -Oreo βœ“Oreo βœ“
Where can I buy gluten free cookies? Tate's Bake Shop βœ“-Tate's Bake Shop βœ“
Where can I find cookies seasonal varieties? Pepperidge Farm βœ“Oreo βœ“-
Where can I find cookies sugar-free options? Tate's Bake Shop βœ“Oreo βœ“-

βœ“ = 100% monopoly. "-" = data not available for this platform.

Category Authority Beats Brand Awareness in AI Recommendations

The cookies category inverts the traditional FMCG playbook. Tate's Bake Shop - a brand with a fraction of Oreo's real-world distribution - holds more monopoly positions on ChatGPT because AI rewards specific category authority, not broad awareness. When an AI assistant is asked 'Where can I find gourmet cookies?' it does not recommend the most-advertised brand; it recommends the brand most specifically associated with gourmet quality in its training data. The strategic implication: any brand that builds deep, specific authority around two or three consumer needs can achieve monopoly positions that are disproportionate to its market size.

Platform Personalities: 3 AIs, 3 Different Markets

Each AI assistant has developed distinct recommendation biases in the cookies category. ChatGPT rewards premium craft positioning, Gemini favors heritage mass-market brands, and Claude balances quality with value pragmatism. Understanding these personalities is essential for platform-specific content strategy.

ChatGPT
"The Artisan Connoisseur"
#1 BrandTate's Bake Shop (63.9%)
#2 BrandOreo (8.8%)
Tate's Bake Shop: Discovery β†’
Decision
50.0% β†’
71.4%
100% Monopolies12 prompts
Gemini
"The Heritage Enthusiast"
#1 BrandOreo (46.2%)
#2 BrandTate's Bake Shop (16.7%)
Oreo: Discovery β†’
Decision
100.0% β†’
40.2%
100% Monopolies19 prompts
Claude
"The Pragmatic Curator"
#1 BrandTate's Bake Shop (34.9%)
#2 BrandOreo (30.7%)
Tate's Bake Shop: Discovery β†’
Decision
- β†’
40.0%
100% Monopolies15 prompts

What Each Platform Rewards

ChatGPT

ChatGPT disproportionately rewards premium and craft-positioned brands. Tate's Bake Shop earns a 1.7x affinity score - the highest in the category - reflecting ChatGPT's bias toward quality-forward, ingredient-focused brands. Brands seeking ChatGPT visibility should emphasize artisan credentials, real ingredients, and premium positioning in their content.

Gemini

Gemini favors heritage and iconic brands with strong cultural recognition. Famous Amos (1.6x) and Oreo (1.6x) both earn strong affinity scores, suggesting Gemini rewards brands with long-established consumer associations and broad cultural footprints. Keebler also earns 1.3x affinity, reinforcing the heritage pattern.

Claude

Claude rewards value-conscious and broadly accessible brands. Great Value earns a 1.9x affinity score - the highest single-platform affinity in the dataset - while Pepperidge Farm earns 1.5x. Claude appears to balance quality with accessibility, making it the platform where value-positioned and mid-tier brands have the strongest competitive opportunity.

Cross-Platform Content Vacuums

Showing 5 of 20 consumer questions that appear across all 3 AI assistants where no tracked brand is mentioned on any platform. These are true content vacuums:

Consumer Question Journey Stage Content Opportunity
Should I buy cookies online or in stores?DecisionChannel decision query; high commercial intent
How do gluten-free cookies compare?ResearchGluten-free comparison; high purchase-intent void
How do organic cookies compare in taste?ResearchOrganic taste authority; educational gap for premium brands
How do premium cookies compare to store brands?ResearchHigh-intent comparison; premium vs. store brand buyers
How do protein cookies compare to regular ones?ResearchEmerging protein snack segment; first-mover advantage

πŸ’‘ Content Vacuums: The Highest-ROI Opportunity in AI Cookie Search

20 consumer questions receive zero brand mentions across all three AI platforms. These are true content vacuums - not because the questions are obscure, but because no cookie brand has published authoritative content to fill them. A single well-structured piece of content addressing 'How do premium cookies compare to store brands?' or 'Should I buy cookies online or in stores?' could capture visibility across ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude simultaneously. No competition means first-mover advantage compounds over time as AI models reinforce early associations.

Citation Intelligence - What AI Is Actually Referencing

Brand Share shows who AI recommends. Citation analysis shows why - revealing the sources AI models use to inform their recommendations.

Brand-Owned Citations: Who Has Earned Media Backing?

Brand Most Cited Content Platforms Cited in Answers To Citations
Great Value walmart.com Gemini Where can I find sandwich cookies? 1

⚠️ Every Brand Has Zero Owned Citations - A Category-Wide Vulnerability

With 0% owned citations across all 290 analyzed, every brand in the cookies category is entirely dependent on third-party content for AI visibility. This means no brand controls its own AI narrative. If key third-party sources shift their coverage - or begin favoring competitors - any brand's AI presence can erode without warning. Building owned citation assets is an uncontested strategic opportunity in this category.

Regional Citation Patterns

Region Top Sources (citations)
Singapore thewholekitchen.com.sg (3), womensweekly.com.sg (2), guiltfreefood.sg (2)
United Kingdom cam.ac.uk (2), english-heritage.org.uk (1), mindfuleating.org.uk (1)
Canada everydayglutenfreegourmet.ca (2), ellegourmet.ca (1), shopcoco.ca (1)
Australia justlittleluxuries.com.au (2), hellocookieco.com.au (1), nbia.org.au (1)
India prizi.in (1)
South Korea koryomart.co.kr (1)

🌍 Singapore and UK Citations Signal International Consumer Interest

Regional citation patterns reveal meaningful international demand signals. Singapore contributes citations from thewholekitchen.com.sg, womensweekly.com.sg, and coldstorage.com.sg, while the UK contributes from cam.ac.uk and mindfuleating.org.uk. Brands with international ambitions should note that AI assistants in these markets may be drawing on local sources - creating both a risk and an opportunity for region-specific content investment.

Third-Party Earned Media Is the Only Currency Driving AI Visibility

The cookies category has a striking citation structure: 289 third-party citations drive all AI visibility, with only 1 brand-owned citation in the entire dataset (Great Value via walmart.com on Gemini). Brands like Tate's Bake Shop that command 63.9% Brand Share on ChatGPT are doing so entirely on the strength of earned media - reviews, editorial coverage, and food publications. This validates the earned media model but also exposes a structural risk: high Brand Share built on zero owned citations is a house of cards if third-party sentiment shifts.

Third-Party Sources - The 100% You Don't Control

100%
Third-Party Citations
289
Total 3P Citations
6
Source Channels
17
Top Channel Prompts

Channel Breakdown: Where Third-Party Influence Lives

Channel Top Sources Prompts Strategic Implication
Specialty Bakeries & Cookie Brands cheryls.com, levainbakery.com, hillcountrychocolate.com, ohmygoodness.co 14 Artisan bakery coverage drives premium brand associations across platforms
Food & Baking Media kingarthurbaking.com, redpathsugar.com, thekitchn.com, thewholekitchen.com.sg 17 Recipe and ingredient authority sites are primary AI citation sources
Video & Social Platforms youtube.com, reddit.com 9 User-generated content and video reviews influence AI recommendations
Reference & Knowledge wikipedia.org 5 Wikipedia presence builds baseline brand credibility across all platforms
Health & Nutrition Authority nih.gov, harvard.edu 7 Academic health sources drive better-for-you and dietary cookie queries
Travel & Lifestyle Media travelandleisureasia.com 3 Lifestyle editorial coverage extends cookie brand reach to gifting and travel occasions
🎯

Three Domains Dominate Citation Breadth - Prioritize These First

cheryls.com and kingarthurbaking.com each appear across 6 prompts - the broadest citation footprint in the dataset. youtube.com covers 5 prompts. These three domains represent the highest-leverage outreach targets: a single placement or feature on any of them can influence AI responses across multiple consumer queries simultaneously. Brands should prioritize earned coverage on these platforms before pursuing long-tail sources.

πŸ“

Match Content Type to Citation Channel for Maximum AI Impact

Different citation channels serve different AI query types. Health and nutrition sources (nih.gov, harvard.edu) drive better-for-you and dietary queries - brands with health credentials should pursue academic and clinical coverage. Specialty bakery sites drive premium and gourmet queries. Food media drives recipe and ingredient authority. A channel-matched content strategy ensures brand mentions appear in the right context for the right consumer question.

Priority Outreach Targets

cheryls.com6 prompts
kingarthurbaking.com6 prompts
youtube.com5 prompts

πŸ’‘ One Earned Media Placement Can Influence Dozens of AI Responses

In a category where 100% of citations are third-party, earned media is not a supporting tactic - it is the entire AI visibility strategy. A single feature on kingarthurbaking.com or cheryls.com can be cited across 6 different consumer queries on multiple platforms. The multiplier effect is real: one piece of earned media, placed on the right domain, compounds into AI visibility across the full consumer journey - from Discovery through Decision stage.

Strategic Recommendations & Key Takeaways

What To Do Next - By Company Archetype

Archetype Who You Are Immediate Priority
Premium / Craft Leader Tate's Bake Shop, Pepperidge Farm Defend ChatGPT monopoly positions by building owned citation assets. Tate's Bake Shop holds 100% share on gluten-free and gourmet queries but has zero owned citations - third-party dependency is the single biggest risk to this leadership position.
Heritage / Mass-Market Brand Oreo, Famous Amos, Keebler Fix the funnel collapse at Decision stage. Oreo loses up to 82.9pp from Discovery to Decision on Claude - competitors like Pepperidge Farm and Great Value are capturing that abandoned share. Decision-stage content investment is the immediate priority.
Value / Retail Brand Great Value, Little Debbie Capitalize on Claude's 1.9x affinity for value brands. Great Value earns 8.9% Brand Share on Claude but is nearly absent on ChatGPT and Gemini - cross-platform expansion requires content that bridges value positioning with quality signals.

The Priority Investments (Any Brand) - Owned + Earned

1

Close Universal Gaps First

20 brand-void prompts represent zero-competition territory across all three platforms. One authoritative content piece per void fills the gap simultaneously on ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude. First-mover advantage in content vacuums compounds over time.

2

Build Owned Citation Assets

With 0% owned citations category-wide, any brand that publishes authoritative, citable content gains a structural advantage. Own your AI narrative before a third party defines it for you.

3

Own Your Niche Completely

Decision-stage monopolies are won by specific attribute ownership, not broad awareness. One 100% monopoly is worth more than 20 also-mentioned appearances - identify two or three ownable consumer needs and dominate them.

4

Target High-Leverage Outreach Domains

cheryls.com and kingarthurbaking.com each span 6 prompts. A single earned placement on either domain influences AI responses across the full consumer journey - from discovery through purchase decision.

Key Takeaways

The Bottom Line

AI search is a growing but not yet dominant discovery channel. Weight these insights relative to your overall channel mix - but note that AI visibility patterns, once established, tend to entrench over time.

(1) AI visibility rewards specific category authority over broad brand awareness, inverting traditional FMCG market dynamics.

(2) No brand dominates all three platforms - a single-platform AI strategy leaves significant share uncontested.

(3) 20 brand-void prompts represent uncontested territory where first-mover content investment faces zero competition.

(4) With 0% owned citations, every brand's AI presence is structurally dependent on third-party coverage it does not control.

(5) Decision-stage monopolies are achievable for any brand that builds deep, specific authority around two or three consumer needs.